El T-MEC, confrontado con el enfoque del Nuevo Regionalismo de la CEPAL

Raul Gustavo Acua-Popocatl; Rafael Alberto Durán-Gómez; Selene Jiménez-Bautista

doi:10.29105/vtga6.1-579

Autores/as

Raul Gustavo Acua-Popocatl Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5454-8851
Rafael Alberto Durán-Gómez Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México
Selene Jiménez-Bautista Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/vtga6.1-579

Palabras clave:

T-MEC, CEPAL, Nuevo Regionalismo

Resumen

El objetivo del presente artículo consiste en
comparar el resultado de las negociaciones del
Tratado México-Estados Unidos-Canadá (T-MEC)
con las 9 recomendaciones del Regionalismo
Abierto (una de ellas especialmente basada en la
unión aduanera) planteadas por la Comisión
Especial para América Latina (CEPAL),
elaboradas como guía para la negociación de
acuerdos comerciales internacionales conducentes
a la creación de áreas de libre comercio -o uniones
aduaneras-, particularmente aquellas en donde se
vinculan economías de países en vías de desarrollo
con países desarrollados. La hipótesis que se
plantea es que el acuerdo negociado se halla lejos
de los objetivos de desarrollo sugeridos por la
propia CEPAL, y beneficia significativamente al
país con mayor desarrollo: los Estados Unidos.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Baldwin, Richard E. (1997) The Causes of Regionalism (Blackwell, 1997).

Balme Richard (1996), “Pourquoi le gouvernement change-t-il d’échelle?, en idem, Les Politiques du Néo-Regionalisme. Action Collective Régionale et Globalisation Economica, Collection Politique Compareé (Paris: 1996),

Bauer, Scott (2018), ”North American Energy Markets Will Benefit From USMCA”, https://seekingalpha.com/article/4219200-north-american-energy-markets-will-benefit usmca, (consultado 12 de enero, 2019).

Bernal, Richard L. (1997), “Vías hacia el Área de Libre Comercio de las Américas”, Revista Capítulos, número dedicado “Tendencias de la Integración de América Latina y el Caribe”, no. 49, enero-marzo de 1997,

Blomstrom, Magnus (1997), “Regional Integration and Foreign Direct Investment: A Conceptual Framework and Three Cases”, Working Paper no. 6019 del National Bureau of Economic Research, en .

Bull, Benedicte (2002) “Regionalization and the «Privatization» of the Latin American States”, Centre for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo, abril de 2002,

Burfisher Mary E. et. al. (2004), Sherman Robinson y Karen Thierfelder, “Regionalism: Old and New, Theory and Practice”, mtid discussion paper no. 65, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035305186.00033

Canis, B., Villarreal, A., & Jones, V. C. (2017). NAFTA and Motor Vehicle Trade (pp. 25): Congressional Research Service.

CIA Factbook. (2017a). Percentage of trade with NAFTA partners Retrieved 14-08-2018, from CIA FACTBOOK

CIA Factbook. (2017b). Trade and GDP of NAFTA Countries 2017 CIA Factbook Retrieved 14-08- 2018, from CIA The World Factbook

CISE (2018) Foreign Trade Information Center, en http://www.sice.oas.org/tradee.asp (consultado noviembre 2018).

Condon, B. J. (2018). Captain America and the Tarnishing of the Crown: The Feud between the WTO Appellate Body and the USA. Journal of World Trade, 52(4), 535-556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/TRAD2018023

Condon, B. J., & Sinha, T. (2003). Drawing lines in sand and snow : border security and North American economic integration. London, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.

Dade, C., Ciuriak, D., Dadkhah, A., & Xiao, J. (2017). The Art of the Trade Deal: Quantifying the benefits of a TPP without the United States, Canada West Foundation (pp. 40). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2973995

Dattu, R., Sathananthan, G., & Schappert, T. (2017). The Trump administration takes aim at Chapter 19 of NAFTA. Retrieved Dec. 1, 2017, from https://www.osler.com/en/resources/crossborder/ 2017/international-trade-brief-trump administration-ta

Doern, G. B., & Tomlin, B. W. (1991). Faith and Fear: The Free Trade Story. Toronto: Stoddart Publishing Co.

Estevadeordal, Antoni (2003), “What Is New in the New Regionalism in the Americas?” (Working Paper 6, Inter-American Development Bank, Integration and Regional Programs Department),

Fernández, Raquel (1997), “Returns to Regionalism: An Evaluation of Nontraditional Gains from Regional Trade Agreements”, World Bank Report # 1816, Program on Regionalism and Development, agosto de 1997, en .

Fuentes. Juan A. (1994), “El regionalismo abierto y la integración económica” en Revista de la CEPAL, no. 53, agosto 1994, Santiago de Chile, pp. 84-87. 379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/96d417fc-es

González-Barrera, A. (2015). More Mexicans Leaving Than Coming to the U.S. Retrieved Nov. 6th, 2018, from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2015/11/19/more-mexicans-leaving-than comingto- the-u-s/

Government of Canada. (2017). Factsheet: Mexico. from http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/mexicomexique/fs_mexico fd_mexique.aspx?lang=eng

Haggard, Stephan (1995), Developing Nations and the Politics of Regional Integration (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1995).

Hveem, Helge (1999), “Political Regionalism: Master or Servant of Economic Internationalization?”, en Bjorn Hettne, Andras Inotai y Osvaldo Sunkel, eds., Globalism and the New Regionalism (Londres: St. Martin’s Press & Macmillan, 1999), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27268-6_4

Hudec, R. E. (1990). The GATT legal system and world trade diplomacy: Butterworth Legal Publishers. Lester, S. (2017). USTR’s NAFTA Chapter 20 Proposals. Retrieved from https://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2017/09/nafta-chapter-20-proposals.html

Langenhove, Luk Van, et. al. (2003) “From Multilateralism to Multiregionalism. What Role for Regional Integration in Global Governance?, onu/cris Ocasional Paper 0-2004/5, noviembre de 2003,

Leycegui, Beatriz, coord. (2022) Reflexiones sobre la política comercial internacional de México 2006-2012, Miguel Angel Porrúa, Cd. de Mex. 2012. 424 pp.

Lighthizer, Robert (2017). Trade Policy Priorities: Robert Lighthizer, Unites States Trade Representative [Retrieved from https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-trade-policy-priorities robert-lighthizer-united-states-traderepresentative.

Lipsey, R. G. (1994). The NAFTA : what's in, what's out, what's next / Richard G. Lipsey, Daniel Schwanen, Ronald J. Wonnacott. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.

López, L. A. (2012). La necesidad de crear un Órgano de Apelación para arbitrajes Inversionista Estado en CIADI. Revista de Derecho Económico Internacional, 3(1), 20.

Macrory, P. (2002). NAFTA Chapter 19: A Successful Experiment in International Trade Dispute Resolution. The Border Papers, C.D. Howe Institute, 168, 27.

Mariscal, Nicolás (2203), Teorías políticas de la integración europea, Madrid: Tecnós, 2003.

Maurer, N. (2006). Was NAFTA Necessary? Trade Policy and Relative Economic Failure since 1982 HBS Working Paper, 43(06), 36.

Mavroidis, P. (2018). From Roosevelt to Reagan to Trump: the Decay of US Internationalism. https://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2018/09/guest-post-from-roosevelt-toreagan to-trump-the-decay-of-us-internationalism.html

Miranda, J. (2018). Whither NAFTA? (Part VII: Why Chapter Nineteen is not Worth the Three Amigos Becoming the Two Amigos). 2018, from http://regulatingforglobalization.com/2018/09/13/whither-nafta-part-vii-chapter nineteennot- worth-three-amigos-becoming-two-amigos/

OECD. Multilateral Agreement on Investment. Retrieved Nov. 6, 2018, from http://www.oecd.org/investment/internationalinvestmentagreements/multilateralagreemento ninvestment.htm

Office of the Chief Economist. (2016). Economic Impact of Canada’s Potential Participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. 2018, from http://international.gc.ca/economisteconomiste/ analysis-analyse/tpp_ei re_ptp.aspx?lang=eng

Schott, Jeffrey J. (1989) Free Trade Areas and U.S. Trade Policy (Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 1989),

Viner, Jacob (1950) “The Customs Union Issue”, capítulo iv (Londres: Stevens, 1950), reproducido íntegramente en Miroslav Jovanovic, International Economic Integration. Critical Perspectives on the World Economy, vol I “Theory and Measurement” (Londres: Londres, 1998). 380

WTO, (2018) “World Trade Report 2018”, www.wto.org (consultado noviembre 2018).