Efecto de la proactividad y actitud del capital humano en el desempeño cívico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/vtga7.1-166Keywords:
Capital Humano, Desempeño cívico, Sector público.Abstract
Este estudio se realiza con la finalidad de analizar el efecto que los factores de proactividad y actitud, tiene sobre el desempeño cívico del personal adscrito a instituciones públicas localizadas en el estado de Tamaulipas, México. La investigación se aborda desde el enfoque cuantitativo, de alcance descriptivo-explicativo, con la participación de 269 trabajadores encuestados. Para el análisis de los datos se utiliza análisis factorial a fin de validar la estructura subyacente de los constructos estudiados, posteriormente se aplica modelo de ecuaciones estructurales. Como principales resultados se determina que los factores de proactividad y actitud explican positiva y significativamente el desempeño cívico del personal, siendo la proactividad la que mayor impacto manifiesta tener con la variable dependiente, lo cual aconseja una adecuada gestión del capital humano a fin de elevar su desempeño laboral y fortalecer sus conductas hacia la institución.
Downloads
References
Araújo, A.C. & Guedes, S.M. (2016). Performance and affects in group problem-solving. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 32(1), 47-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2015.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2015.09.001
Asiaei, K. & Jusoh, R. (2015). A multidimensional view of intellectual capital: the impact on organizational performance. Management Decision, 53(3), 668–697. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2014-0300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2014-0300
Avendaño, F., Campos, C.C., Sánchez, R.A. & Moreno, J.L. (2010). Actitud en el trabajo, base del desempeño. Revista Internacional de la Nueva Gestión ORganizacional, 5(10), 127-131.
Basoredo, C. (2011). Una perspectiva y una forma de explicar la competencia en el contexto del desempeño de las tareas. Anales de Psicología, 27(2), 457-472.
Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00053
Bontis, N. & Serenko, A. (2009). A causal of human capital antecedents and consequents in the financial services industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930910922897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930910922897
Borman, W. C. (2004). The Concept of Organizational Citizenship. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(6), 238–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00316.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00316.x
Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W.C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in the organization (pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brownlee, A. & Motowidlo, S. (2011). Effects of accountability to group members and outcome interdependence on task behavior and interpersonal contextual behavior. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 11(1), 24-34.
Campbell, J.P., McHenry, J.J. & Wise, L.L. (1990). Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel Psychology, 43(2), 313–575. https://doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01561.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01561.x
Chiang, M.M. & Martín, N.J. (2015). Análisis de la satisfacción y el desempeño laboral en los funcionarios de la municipalidad de Talcahuano. Ciencia y Trabajo, 17(54), 159-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-24492015000300001
Coleman, V. I. & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00037-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00037-6
Conway, J. M. (1999). Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.3
Delgado, N., Hernández, E., Rosales, Ch., Díaz, L., Isla, R. & Díaz, D. (2018). Contextual performance in academic settings: the role of personality, self-efficacy, and impression management. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34(2), 63-68. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a8
Díaz, L., Díaz, D., Isla, R., Hernández, E. & Rosales, Ch. (2012). Adaptación al español de la escala de desempeño cívico de Coleman y Borman (2000) y análisis de la estructura empírica del constructo. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(3), 135-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/tr2012a11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2012a11
Fogaca, N., Barbosa, M.C., Campos, M.C., Pereira, L. & Coelho, F.A. (2018). Job performance analysis: scientific studies in the main journals of management and psychology from 2006 to 2015. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 30(4), 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21248
Hair J., Hult, G., Ringle, C. & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS_SEM). Estados Unidos de América: SAG Publications, Inc.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C. & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. México: McGraw-Hill.
Marchezi, A., Felix, B., Matos, A. & dos Santos, A. (2019). Humor at work: a study about the relationship between humor styles, satisfaction with management and individual job performance. Revista de Administración de Brasil de la UFSM, 12(4), 803–820. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465919382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465919382
Martínez, M. & Fierro, E. (2018). Aplicación de la técnica PLS_SEM en la gestión del conocimiento: Un enfoque técnico práctico. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 8(16), 130-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v8i16.336
Myers, D. G. (2003). Psicología social. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Newstrom, J.W. (2011). Comportamiento humano en el trabajo. México: McGraw-Hill.
Parker, S. K., Wang, Y. & Liao, J. (2018). When Is proactivity wise? a review of factors that influence the individual outcomes of proactive behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 14.1-14.28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015302
Pedraza, N.A., Lavín, J., Marmolejo, J., Vasconcelo, R. & Garcia, J.E. (2017). Caracterización del capital intelectual en el sector empresarial del estado de Tamaulipas, México. Visión Gerencial (1), 119-143.
Piccoli, B., Setti, I., Filippi, Z., Argentero, P. & Bellotto, M. (2013). The influence of job insecurity on task and contextual performance: the mediational role of overall job attitude. International Journal of Business Research, 13(3), 155-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18374/IJBR-13-3.10
Ramírez, R. & Nazar, G. (2019). Factores motivacionales de diseño del trabajo y su relación con desempeño laboral. Revista Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho, 19(4), 791-799. https://doi:10.17652/rpot/2019.4.17517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17652/rpot/2019.4.17517
Ramos, P.J., Barrada, J.R., Fernández, E. & Koopmans, L. (2019). Assessing job performance using brief self-report scales: the case of the individual work performance questionnaire. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 35(3), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2019a21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2019a21
Rodríguez, C., Ramírez, R., Fernández, M. & Bustos, C. (2018). Capital psicológico, desempeño contextual y apoyo social del trabajo en salud primaria. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34 (3), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a15
Sackett, P. R. (2002). The tructure of counterproductive work behaviors: dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1&2), 5–11. https://doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00189
Salgado, J. & Cabal, A. (2011). Evaluación del desempeño en la Administración Pública del Principado de Asturias: Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(2), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2011v27n2a1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2011v27n2a1
Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal?. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 446–460. https://doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005
Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S. & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X502359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X502359
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
a). Authors keep copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons attribution license. This license allows others to share the work as long as original authorship and initial publication in this journal is acknowledged.
b). Authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
c). Authors are allowed to self-archive their work in institutional repositories or on their own website before and during the submission process, as this may encourage productive exchanges and increase early and overall citation of the published work.
