Diseño de instrumento de medición para analizar los factores que influyen en la productividad del sector automotriz de México
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/vtga7.2-58Keywords:
Productividad, Factores, IndustriaAbstract
En la actualidad las organizaciones se enfrentan con el reto de promover la mejora de la productividad entre los empleados. Por lo tanto, la productividad juega un papel crucial en la competitividad de la organización. La productividad de las industrias automotrices en México ha sido muy variable a lo largo de los años. Del año 2005 al año 2009, la misma comenzó a descender considerablemente. Probablemente las industrias del sector tomaron medidas, y en el período transcurrido desde el año al 2009 comenzó a incrementarse año tras año. No obstante, en el año 2016 la misma volvió a disminuir, lo cual evidencia una inestabilidad en la productividad de las empresas automotrices. El objetivo de esta investigación es diseñar un instrumento de medición para el análisis de los factores determinantes para la variación de la productividad en el sector automotriz de México.
Downloads
References
Abad, F. J., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & García, C. (2011). Measurement in Social and Educational Sciences.
Aghion, P. (2016). Competitiveness and growth policy design. Moving to the Innovation Frontier, 5.
Amodio, F., & Martinez-Carrasco, M. A. (2018). Input Allocation, Workforce Management, and Productivity Spillovers: Evidence from Personnel Data. The Review of Economic Studies, 85(4), 1937–1970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy010
Anguita, J. C., Labrador, J. R., & Campos, J. D. (2003). La encuesta como tecnica de investigacion. Atención Primaria, 31 (8)(I), 527–538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0212-6567(03)70728-8
Arcidiacono, P., Kinsler, J., & Price, J. (2017). Team, Productivity Spillovers in From, Production: Evidence Basketball, Professional. Journal of Labor Economics, 37(1), 191–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/687529
Bartz‑Zuccala, P., Mohnen, H., & Schweiger, W. (2018). The Role of Innovation and Management Practices in Determining Firm Productivity. Comparative Economic Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-018-0075-3
Bloom, N., Brynjolfsson, E., Foster, L., Jarmin, R. S., Patnaik, M., Saporta-Eksten, I., & Reenen, J. Van. (2017). What Drives Differences in Management? National Bureau of Economic Research, w23300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w23300
Bloom, N., Sadun, R., & Reenen, J. Van. (2016). Management as a Technology? National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w22327
Castellani, D., Piva, M., Schubert, T., & Vivarelli, M. (2016). R&D and Productivity in the US and the EU: Sectoral Specificities and Differences in the Crisis. Papers in Innovation Studies, 15.
Card, D., Cardoso, A. R., Heining, J., & Kline, P. (2018). Firms and labor market inequality: Evidence and some theory. Journal of Labor Economics, 36(S1), S13–S70.estimates. International Journal of Production Research, 40(12), 2705–2720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/694153
Chyung, S. Y., Roberts, K., Swanson, I., & Hankinson, A. (2017). EVIDENCE-BASED SURVEY DESIGN: THE USE OF A MIDPOINT ON THE LIKERT SCALE. Performance Improvement, 56(10), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21727
Crotte, I. R. R. (2011). Elementos Para El Diseño De Técnicas De Investigación: Una Propuesta De Definiciones Y Procedimientos En La Investigación Científica. Tiempo de Educar, 12(24), 277–297.
Dai, X., Sun, Z., & Liu, Ha. (2018). Decomposing the contribution of firm innovation to aggregate productivity growth: the case of the Chinese manufacturing industry. Applied Economics Letters, 26(7), 543–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1488038
Fazlıoğlu, B., Dalgıç, B., & Yereli, A. (2018). The effect of innovation on productivity: evidence from Turkish manufacturing firms. Industry and Innovation, 26(4), 439–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1440196
González, J., Vila, M., & Guisado, M. (2019). Exploring the complementarity between foreign technology, embedded technology, and increase of productive capacity. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(1), 39–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.7600
Hernández, S. R., Baptista, L. P., & Fernández, C. C. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. McGraw-Hill Interamericana, 533.
Khandker, V., & Thakurata, I. (2018). Factors encouraging complete adoption of agricultural technologies: The case of hybrid rice cultivation in India. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 8(2), 270–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-05-2016-0037
Lee, C., & Leem, C. (2016). An empirical analysis of issues and trends in manufacturing productivity through a 30-year literature review. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 27(2), 147–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7166/27-2-1363
Lee, H., & Li, C. (2018). Supplier quality management: Investment, inspection, and incentives. Production and Operations Management, 27(2), 304–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12802
Long, F., Zeiler, P., & Bertsche, B. (2018). Realistic modeling of flexibility and dependence in production systems in Industry 4.0 for analyzing their productivity and availability. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 232(2), 174–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X17731938
Mendoza, J., & Garza, J. B. (2009). La medicion en el proceso de investigacion cientifica: Evaluacion de validez de contenido y confiabilidad. Innovaciones de Negocios, 6(1), 17–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn6.11-2
Menzel, A. (2015). Organizational Learning: Experimental Evidence from Bangladeshi Garment Factories.
Nikoofal, M., & Gümüş, M. (2018). Quality at the source or at the end? Managing supplier quality under information asymmetry. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 20(3), 498–516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0652
OICA. (2021). International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers.
Prat, R. S., & Doval, E. D. (2003). Construcción y análisis de escalas. Analisis Multivariable Para Las Ciencias Sociales, 43–89.
Preenen, P., Vergeer, R., Kraan, K., & Dhondt, S. (2017). Labour productivity and innovation performance: The importance of internal labor flexibility practices. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 38(2), 271–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X15572836
Purdey, B. (2013). Occupant stimulus-response workplace productivity and the vexed question of measurement. Facilities, 31(11–12), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-03-2012-0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/F-03-2012-0021
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Loraine Gastell Piloto, Lourdes Fabiola Espinoza Parada, Jesús Gerardo Cruz Álvarez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
a). Authors keep copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons attribution license. This license allows others to share the work as long as original authorship and initial publication in this journal is acknowledged.
b). Authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
c). Authors are allowed to self-archive their work in institutional repositories or on their own website before and during the submission process, as this may encourage productive exchanges and increase early and overall citation of the published work.
