Influencia de la responsabilidad ambiental en el desempeño de las empresas manufactureras

Authors

  • Cecilia Martínez-Villalobos Autonomous University of Aguascalientes image/svg+xml
  • Roberto González-Acolt Autonomous University of Aguascaliente image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/vtga4.1-799

Keywords:

desempeño, manufactura, responsabilidad ambiental

Abstract

This document explores the relationship between environmental responsibility and economic performance measured with the net income of manufacturing companies in Mexico. Using data obtained from the 2014 Economic Census, with a total of 3,216 companies. Using the ordinary least squares method, it is found that some of the environmental actions have a positive influence on net income. However, it is necessary to identify the type of activities that can result in a win-win for companies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Stewart, E., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 4, 1-21

Cai, L, Cui, J y Jo H., (2015). Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Firm Risk, Journal of Business Ethics, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2630-4

Féres, J, y Reynaud, A., (2012) Assessing the impact of formal and informal regulations on environmental and economic performance of Brazilian manufacturing firms. Environmental Resource Economics, 52: 65-85

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2018) Banco Infor- mación Económica Cuentas nacionales > Cuentas eco- nómicas y ecológicas de México a precios corrientes, base 2013 > Producto interno neto ajustado ambien- talmente, por sector económico > Producto interno neto ajustado ambientalmente de los Sectores 31-33. Indus- trias manufactureras > Producto Interno Bruto, a precios de mercado >Producto interno neto > Costos totales por agotamiento y degradación ambiental > Costos por De- gradación. Recuperado de http://www.inegi.org.mx/sis temas/bie/ el 23 de abril de 2018.

Jo, H., Kim, H., and Park, K. (2015) Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance in the Financial Services Sector, Journal of Business Ethics, 131: 257-284

Mercado A. (2014). La calidad de los datos ambientales oficiales relacionados con las empresas en México. En E. C. d. México (Ed.). La estadística ambiental en México.

Nikolaou, I.E., Chymis, A., & Evangelinos, K. (2013). Environ- mental information, asymmetric information, and financial markets: A game-theoretic approach. Environmental Model Assess, 18, 615-628

Porter M. y Kramer M. (2006) Estrategia y sociedad: el vínculo entre ventaja competitiva y responsabilidad social corpo- rativa. Harvard Business Review 82(12) 42-56

Porter, M.E., & Van Der Linde, C. (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9; 97-118

Ramanathan, R., Black, A., Nath, P. y Muyldermans, L. (2010). Im- pact of environmental regulations on innovation and performance in the UK industrial sector. Management Decision. 48(10), 1493-1513.

Romo M.D., Romero H. O., & Samaniego B. R., (2005). Industria y medio ambiente en México hacia un nuevo paradigma para el control de la contaminación (H. C. d. D. L. Legis latura, I. T. A. d. México, & M. A. Porrúa Eds.)

Schultze, W., & Trommer, R. (2012) The concept of environmental performance and its measurement in empirical studies. Journal of Management Control, 22, 375-412.

Wahba, H. (2008) Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examination. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 15, 89-99.

Wang, H. (2010). Factor analysis of corporate environmental responsibility from the stakeholder theory perspective. En environmental Development Sustainability, 12, 481-490.

Published

2018-12-21

How to Cite

Martínez-Villalobos, C., & González-Acolt, R. (2018). Influencia de la responsabilidad ambiental en el desempeño de las empresas manufactureras. Vinculategica Efan, 4(2), 512–517. https://doi.org/10.29105/vtga4.1-799