El concepto de trabajo en equipo: percepción de empleados en empresas de Monterrey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/vtga5.1-884Keywords:
trabajo en equipo, análisis de concepto, equipo de trabajo.Abstract
From the perspective of theory development, it is important that the constructs used be reinforced and clarified
over time. Teamwork from the academic perspective has
been studied, however, to further clarify it as a construct,
in this research, on the one hand, the method of concept
analysis has been used, which involves a literature review to establish a definition of it. On the other hand, it is
important to identify a perspective of those who practice
it or know it in a context of everyday reality, in this sense,
the perception of employees in companies in the metropolitan area of Monterrey was also obtained. With a qualitative approach through content analysis, we obtained
as a result, the conceptual and colloquial definitions of
teamwork, in addition, a comparison was made between
the two that showed certain differences between them.
Downloads
References
Baldwin, M. A. (2008). Concept analysis as a method of inquiry. Nurse researcher, 15(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2008.01.15.2.49.c6329
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1997). Teamwork competencies: The interaction of team member knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Workforce readiness: Competencies and assessment, 151- 174.
Delarue, A., Van Hootegem, G., Procter, S., & Burridge, M. (2008). Teamworking and organizational performance: a review of survey‐based research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(2), 127-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00227.x
Franco, C. A., & Velásquez, F. (2000). Cómo mejorar la eficiencia operativa utilizando el trabajo en equipo. Estudios Gerenciales, 16(76), 27-35.
Hupcey, J. E., Morse, J. M, Lenz, E., & Cerdas-Tasón, M. (1996). Wilsonian methods of concept analysis: a critique. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 10(3), 185.
Hupcey, J. E., Morse, J. M., & Lenz, E. R. & Cerdas-Tasón, M. (1996). Concept analysis in nursing research: a critical appraisal. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 10(3), 253-277.
King, I. M. (1988). Concepts: essential elements of theories. Nursing science quarterly, 1(1), 22-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089431848800100107
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
Medina, L. S. (2005). Construcción de una definición de enfermería clínica desde una perspectiva investigativa. Investigación en Enfermería: Imagen y Desarrollo, 7(1-2), 14-21.
Paris, C. R., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1052-1075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130050084879
Penrod, J., & Hupcey, J. E. (2005). Enhancing methodological clarity: principle‐based concept analysis. Journal of advanced nursing, 50(4), 403-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03405.x
Risjord, M. (2009). Rethinking concept analysis. Journal of advanced nursing, 65(3), 684-691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04903.x
Salas, E., Burke, C. S., & Cannon‐Bowers, J. A. (2000). Teamwork: emerging principles. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(4), 339-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00046
Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human factors, 50(3), 540-547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288457
Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., Burke, C. S., & Goodwin, G. F. (2009). The wisdom of collectives in organizations: An update of the teamwork competencies. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches, 39-79.
Salas, E., Shuffler, M. L., Thayer, A. L., Bedwell, W. L., & Lazzara, E. H. (2015). Understanding and improving teamwork in organizations: A scientifically based practical guide. Human Resource Management, 54(4), 599-622. Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “big five” in team work? Small group research, 36(5), 555-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21628
Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of management, 20(2), 503-530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639402000210
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquía.
Suddaby, R. (2010). Editor's comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. The Academy of Management Review, 346-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.51141319
Usheva, M. (2016). Team and teamwork in modern European HR management.
Wacker, J. G. (2004). A theory of formal conceptual definitions: developing theory-building measurement instruments. Journal of Operations Management, 22(6), 629-650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.08.002
Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371
Xyrichis, A., & Ream, E. (2008). Teamwork: a concept analysis. Journal of advanced nursing, 61(2), 232-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04496.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
a). Authors keep copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons attribution license. This license allows others to share the work as long as original authorship and initial publication in this journal is acknowledged.
b). Authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
c). Authors are allowed to self-archive their work in institutional repositories or on their own website before and during the submission process, as this may encourage productive exchanges and increase early and overall citation of the published work.
