El presente y el futuro deseable del liderazgo en la organización mexicana: un estudio cualitativo

Joel Mendoza-Gómez; Esmeralda Guadalupe Rodríguez-Pérez

doi:10.29105/vtga12.2-1222

Autores/as

Joel Mendoza-Gómez Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7525-6367
Esmeralda Guadalupe Rodríguez-Pérez Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/vtga12.2-1222

Palabras clave:

Organizaciones mexicanas, Liderazgo como supervisión, Liderazgo autoritario, Liderazgo actual o tradicional, Liderazgo ideal

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio es caracterizar el liderazgo actual y el liderazgo futuro que empleados de la organización mexicana han mencionado en este estudio cualitativo. El método utilizado es la entrevista en preguntas abiertas para obtener los objetivos planteados. Una vez que se transcribieron las respuestas se utilizó el software MAXQDA para codificar y analizarlas. Se entrevistaron a 47 empleados y directivos medios de ambos sexos para conocer su percepción a las respuestas sobre el liderazgo mexicano de acuerdo con su experiencia. Se hizo una amplia revisión de literatura para contrastarla con los hallazgos obtenidos. Dichos hallazgos caracterizaron a ambos tipos de liderazgo, incluyendo menciones literales de los participantes. Así mismo, se obtuvieron las comparaciones entre los géneros y los grupos de generaciones. Estos hallazgos fueron contrastados con la teoría obtenida, de manera que, se respaldaron con los diversos temas de la teoría. Se concluyó que se obtuvieron los objetivos y el propósito, lo cual permitió cubrir las brechas entre ambos tipos de liderazgo consiguiendo las aportaciones al conocimiento del liderazgo en el contexto mexicano.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Agazu, B., y Debela, K. (2024). Leadership Effectiveness. Library Leadership y Management. https://doi.org/10.5860/llm.v38i2.7611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/llm.v38i2.7611

Akın, C. (2022). A Theoretical Evaluation on Traditional Leadership Approaches. Education Quarterly Reviews. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.596

Anyanugo, M., Ololube, N., y Okuru, C. (2024). Establishing the Basis for Organizational Success through Effective Leadership. South Asian Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjhss.2024.v06i04.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjhss.2024.v06i04.003

Benmira, S., y Agboola, M. (2021). Evolution of leadership theory. BMJ Leader, 5, 3 - 5. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2020-000296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2020-000296

Bolman, L. G., y Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. John Wiley y Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119281856

Carton, A. (2021). The Science of Leadership: A Theoretical Model and Research Agenda. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091227

Chamberlin, M., Nahrgang, J., Sessions, H., y De Jong, B. (2024). An examination of shared leadership configurations and their effectiveness in teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2774

Chiu, C. Y. C., Owens, B. P., y Tesluk, P. E. (2016). Initiating and utilizing shared leadership in teams: The role of leader humility, team proactive personality, and team performance capability. Journal of applied psychology, 101(12), 1705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000159

Dinh, J., Lord, R., Gardner, W., Meuser, J., Liden, R., y Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. Leadership Quarterly, 25, 36-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2013.11.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005

dos Reis, M. M., y Carrino, A. L. (2024). Gestão de equipes: O papel do líder para o desenvolvimento de uma empresa. International Seven Journal of Multidisciplinary, 3(3), 1024–1035. https://doi.org/10.56238/isevmjv3n3-013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56238/isevmjv3n3-013

Gioia, D. (2021). A systematic methodology for doing qualitative research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(1), 20-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320982715

Guinote, A. (2017). How Power Affects People: Activating, Wanting, and Goal Seeking. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 353–381. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044153

Hannah, S., Avolio, B., Luthans, F., y Harms, P. (2008). Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 669-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2008.09.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.007

Hoffman, B., Woehr, D., Maldagen-Youngjohn, R., y Lyons, B. (2011). Great man or great myth? A quantitative review of the relationship between individual differences and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 347-381. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X485207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X485207

Kim, S., y Shin, M. (2022). Effective Leadership Differs Between Organizations: A Comparative Study of US and German Multinational Corporations in South Korea. SAGE Open, 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221097890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221097890

Koeslag-Kreunen, M., Van Den Bossche, P., Hoven, M., Van Der Klink, M., y Gijselaers, W. (2018). When Leadership Powers Team Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Small Group Research, 49, 475 - 513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496418764824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496418764824

Liao, C., Wu, J., Wayne, S., Liden, R., y Song, L. (2024). It’s Unexpected but Good: Leader Traditionality Fuels Greater Follower Reciprocation to Servant Leadership. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231221979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231221979

Lorinkova, N., Pearsall, M., y Sims, H. (2013). Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 573-596. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.0132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0132

Maner, J., y Mead, N. (2010). The essential tension between leadership and power: when leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest.. Journal of personality and social psychology, 99 3, 482-97 . https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018559

Manzo, A. (2023). The profile of the Mexican employer: a sociocultural issue linked to gender? Proceedings of The World Conference on Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.33422/worldcss.v1i1.36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33422/worldcss.v1i1.36

Meuser, J., Gardner, W., Dinh, J., Hu, J., Liden, R., y Lord, R. (2016). A Network Analysis of Leadership Theory. Journal of Management, 42, 1374 - 1403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316647099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316647099

Rodriguez, G. (2023). Impact of Leadership on Corporate Social Responsibility in Mexico. International Journal of Leadership and Governance. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijlg.1924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47604/ijlg.1924

Ruiz, C., y Hamlin, B. (2019). Perceived managerial and leadership effectiveness in Mexico and the USA. European Journal of Training and Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-01-2019-0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-01-2019-0004

Ruiz, C., Hamlin, R., y Torres, L. (2023). Comparative study of the perceptions of Mexican and Colombian employees about managerial and leadership behavioural effectiveness. European Journal of Training and Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-06-2021-0076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-06-2021-0076

Strauss, A., y Corbin, J. (2016). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Universidad de Antioquia.

Tost, L., Gino, F., y Larrick, R. (2013). When Power Makes Others Speechless: The Negative Impact of Leader Power on Team Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1465-1486. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.0180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0180

Turner, C., y Astin, F. (2021). Grounded theory: what makes a grounded theory study? European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 20(3), 285-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaa034

Van Dijke, M. (2020). Power and leadership. Current opinion in psychology, 33, 6-11 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.012

Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of management review, 14(4), 490-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258554

Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations, 9/e. Pearson Education India.