Percepción de los conocimientos de la analítica del aprendizaje en la educación superior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/vtga9.5-506Keywords:
Analítica del Aprendizaje, Educación Superior, Conocimiento de analítica de datos, Gestión del CambioAbstract
Se pueden obtener múltiples beneficios del análisis de aprendizaje (AA) en las Instituciones de Educación Superior (IES) y las partes interesadas, mediante el uso de una variedad de estrategias de análisis de datos para generar recomendaciones y conocimientos sumativos, predictivos y en tiempo real. Sin embargo, es necesario analizar si los entornos educativos y el personal académico y administrativo están capacitados para llevar a cabo estos procesos. En este trabajo se utilizó una matriz de beneficios de la AA para investigar las capacidades actuales de la AA en las IES, se exploró la fuente de datos para generar un marco valido de AA y comprender como se perciben los conocimientos relacionados con la AA. Concluimos que se necesita más investigación empírica sobre la solidez y los beneficios esperados de los marcos de análisis de aprendizaje para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje para confirmar la promesa de esta nueva tecnología prometedora.
Downloads
References
Azevedo, R., Taub, M., y Mudrick, N.V. (2018). Understanding and reasoning about real-time cognitive, affective, and metacognitive processes to foster self-regulation with advanced learning technologies. In D.H. Schunk y J.A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 254-270). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-17
Blumenstein, M. (2020). Synergies of Learning Analytics and Learning Design: A Systematic Review of Student Outcomes. Journal of Learning Analytics, 7(3), 13-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.18608/jla.2020.73.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2020.73.3
Cervantes, J., Garcia-Lamont, F., Rodríguez-Mazahua, L., & Lopez, A. (2020). A comprehensive survey on support vector machine classification: Applications, challenges and trends. Neurocomputing, 408, 189-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.10.118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.10.118
Cogliano, M., Bernacki, M. L., Hilpert, J. C., & Strong, C. L. (2022). A self-regulated learning analytics prediction-and-intervention design: Detecting and supporting struggling biology students. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000745
Fan, Y., van der Graaf, J., Lim L., Raković, M., Singh, S., Kilgour, J., ... & Gašević, D. (2022). Towards investigating the validity of measurement of self-regulated learning based on trace data. Metacognition and Learning, 17(3), 949-987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09291-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09291-1
Farrell, T., Alani, H., & Mikroyannidis, A. (2022). Mediating learning with learning analytics technology: guidelines for practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2067745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2067745
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gašević, D. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: the effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet and Higher Education, 28, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002
Huda, M., Maseleno, A., Shahrill, M., Jasmi, K. A., Mustari, I., & Basiron, B. (2017). Exploring adaptive teaching competencies in big data era. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i03.6434
Ifenthaler, D., & Drachsler, H. (2020). Learning analytics. Handbuch Bildungstechnologie. Konzeption und Einsatz digitaler Lernumgebungen, 515-525. ISBN: 978-3-662-54368-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54368-9_42
Kevan, J. M., & Ryan, P. R. (2016). Experience API: flexible, decentralized and activity-centric data collection. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-015-9260-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-015-9260-x
Mangaroska, K., & Giannakos, M. (2018). Learning analytics for learning design: A systematic literature review of analytics-driven design to enhance learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(4), 516-534. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2868673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2868673
Nieto, Y., Gacía-Díaz, V., Montenegro, C., González, C. C., & Crespo, R. G. (2019). Usage of machine learning for strategic decision making at higher educational institutions. IEEE Access, 7, 75007-75017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919343
Schumacher, C., & Ifenthaler, D. (2018). Features students really expect from learning analytics. Computers in human behavior, 78, 397-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.030
Swan, K., Matthews, D., Bogle, L., Boles, E., & Day, S. (2012). Linking online course design and implementation to learning outcomes: A design experiment. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 81–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.07.002
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher education, 76, 467-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
Tsai, Y. S., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., & Gašević, D. (2020, March). The privacy paradox and its implications for learning analytics. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 230-239). https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375536
Tsai, Y.-S., Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Tammets, K., Kollom, K., & Gašević, D. (2018). The SHEILA Framework: Informing Institutional Strategies and Policy Processes of Learning Analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(3), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2018.53.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2018.53.2
Viberg, O., Khalil, M., & Baars, M. (2020, March). Self-regulated learning and learning analytics in online learning environments: A review of empirical research. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 524-533). https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375483
Waldman, A. E. (2018). Privacy as trust: Information privacy for an information age. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316888667
Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Tsai, Y. S., Drachsler, H., Scheffel, M., & Gašević, D. (2021). An exploratory latent class analysis of student expectations towards learning analytics services. The Internet and Higher Education, 51, 100818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100818
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Maria de Jesús Araiza Vázquez, Federico Guadalupe Figueroa Garza, José Felipe Ramirez Ramirez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
a). Authors keep copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons attribution license. This license allows others to share the work as long as original authorship and initial publication in this journal is acknowledged.
b). Authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
c). Authors are allowed to self-archive their work in institutional repositories or on their own website before and during the submission process, as this may encourage productive exchanges and increase early and overall citation of the published work.
