Transferencia de tecnología universidad-industria y el sistema de innovación en México
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/vtga5.2-770Keywords:
Innovación, Economía, Industria, Universidades, DesarrolloAbstract
Through a systematic review of literature respecting the transfer of university-industry technology from the United States, Canada and Mexico, specifically the university patents linked to the economic development of these countries, the need arose for the innovation system in Mexico to be strengthened through the exploitation, production and dissemination of knowledge, essential requirements for the growth and development of both its academic community and the business sector. The review shows that the generation and transfer of knowledge to the commercial sphere, that is, from universities to companies, through licensing mechanisms, potentially contributed to generating income, as well as establishing relationships with external actors and improving growth and development in the region.
Downloads
References
Aboites, J. y Soria, M. (2008). Economía del Conocimiento y Propiedad Intelectual. Lecciones para la Economía Mexicana. Siglo XXI-UAM-Unidad Xochimilco, Ciudad de México, México.
Albornoz, M. (2009). Indicadores de innovación: las dificultades de un concepto en evolución. Revista iberoamericana de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad, 5(13), 9-25.
Benavides, O. A. (2004). La innovación tecnológica desde una perspectiva evolutiva. Cuadernos de Economía, 23(41), 49-70. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-47722004 000200003&lng=en&tlng=es.
Bercovitz, J. y Feldmann, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge based economic development. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5029-z
Bramuglia, C. (2000). La Tecnología y la Teoría Económica de la Innovación. Instituto de Investigaciones Gino Germani. Universidad de Buenos aires. Argentina.
Calderón-Martínez, G. (2014). Patentes en Instituciones de Educación Superior en México. Revista de la Educación Superior, 42(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2014.06.001
Cante, Freddy. (2000). El teorema de la imposibilidad de Arrow y la elección interdependiente. Cuadernos de Economía, 19(33), 71-82. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121- 47722000000200004&lng=en&tlng=es.
Cimoli, M. (2000). Developing innovation systems: Mexico in a global context. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
De Moorte, K., y Crispeels, T. (2018). International university-university technology transfer: strategic management framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 145155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.002
Diario Oficial de la Federación. (2018). Presupuesto de egresos de la Federación para el ejercicio fiscal 2018.
Dosi, G., Llerena, P. y Sylos, L.M. (2006). The relation between science, technologies and their industrial explotation: an illustration through the myths and realities of the socalled: European Paradox. Research Policy: 35(10), Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, Holanda, 1450-1464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.012
Dubickis, M. y Gaile, S.E. (2015). Perspectives on innovation and technology transfer. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, pp. 965-970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.512
Eisenberg, R. (1996). Public research and private development: patents and technology transfer in government sponsored research. Virginia Law Review, 82, pp. 1663-1727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1073686
Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1 (1), pp. 64-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2004.004551
Freeman, C. (1982). Economics of industrial innovation. United States.
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Londres: Pinter.
Gee, S. (1981). Technology transfer, innovation and international competitveness.
Government of Canada. (1999). Report of the Expert Panel on the Commercialization of University Research. Queen’s Printer, Ottawa.
Instituto Mexicano de Propiedad Industrial. (2014). IMPI en cifras 2014.
Instituto Mexicano de Propiedad Industrial. (2018). IMPI en cifras 2018.
Jansa, S. (2010). Resumen del Manual de Oslo sobre innovación. Manual de Oslo sobre innovación, 1-10.
Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H., y Kushnirc, D. (2016). The globalization of academic entrepreneurship? The recent growth (2009-2014) in university patenting decomposed. Industry and Higher Education , 30 (4), pp. 257-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422216660253
Link, A., Siegel, D. y Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16 (4), pp. 1631 641-655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm020
Lundvall, B. (1992). National innovation systems: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Londres: Pinter.
Lundvall, B. (2016). The learning economy and the economics of hope. Anthem Press, UK, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_626406
Metcalfe, S. (1995). The economic Foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives, in P. Stoneman (ed.). Handbook of economics of innovation and technological change. Blackwell Publishers. Oxford (UK)/Cambridge (US).
Mowery, D. C. y Ziedonis, A.A. (2002). Academic patent quality and quality before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Reserch Policy , 31, pp. 399-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00116-0
Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., Stampt, B.N. y Ziedonis, A.A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy 30, pp. 99-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6
Nelson, R.R. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change.
Nelson, R.R. (1993). National innovation systems. A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195076165.001.0001
Noisi, J. (2006). Success factors in Canadian academic spin-offs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), pp.451–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-0006-8
Organización de Cooperación y Desarrollo Económico (OCDE). (1991).
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2015). Informe de la UNESCO sobre la Ciencia: hacia 2030.
Patel, P., y K. Pavitt (1994). The nature and economic importance of national innovation systems. OECD. Paris.
Rothschild, E.M. (2015). Technology transfer and the instrumentality of Bayh-Dole: a comparative study of patent ans publishing data, 1973-2007. Syracuse University.
Samuelson, P. y Nordhaus, D. (2010). Microeconomía con aplicaciones a Latinoamérica, Decimonovena edición, Mac Graw Hill, México.
Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of tconomic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle.
Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. Primera Edición, McGraw- Hill, New York
Schumpeter, J. (1942) Capitalismo, Socialismo y Democracia.
Smith, Adam (1776/1992). Investigación sobre la naturaleza y causa de la riqueza de las naciones. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México.
Smyth, S.J., Williams, A. y Vasilescu, J. (2016). An assessment of Canadian university technology transfer offices. Int. J. Intellectual Property Management, 9(1), pp.32–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2016.079584
Statistics Canada. (2010). Survey of intellectual property commercialization in the higher education sector 2008. Queen’s Printer, Ottawa.
Vargas, G. y Rodríguez, C. (2013). Un análisis microeconómico de los efectos de la innovación en el desarrollo y el bienestar. Recuperado de https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0185084913713410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-0849(13)71341-0
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2018). Global index of innovation 2018: Energizing the world with innovation. I
Wright, M. (2018). The comercialization of science: from determinants to impact. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32 (1), pp. 1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0218
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
a). Authors keep copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons attribution license. This license allows others to share the work as long as original authorship and initial publication in this journal is acknowledged.
b). Authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
c). Authors are allowed to self-archive their work in institutional repositories or on their own website before and during the submission process, as this may encourage productive exchanges and increase early and overall citation of the published work.
