Perfiles de Enfoque Temporal y Mal-estar (Ill-being) en Empleados de Toluca, México
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/vtga8.4-277Keywords:
Bienestar laboral, rumia emocional, estrés, enfoque temporalAbstract
El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar la relación existente entre los perfiles de enfoque temporal (diversas combinaciones de atención cognitiva al presente, pasado y futuro) y tres variables detractoras del bienestar en el trabajo: La rumia, el estrés y el mal-estar laboral afectivo. Se aplicó una encuesta longitudinal en línea a una muestra de 60 personas. Mediante análisis de conglomerados y análisis de varianza, se detectaron tres perfiles en enfoque temporal. Los perfiles difirieron significativamente en términos de la rumia, parcialmente en el estrés y se asemejaron en cuanto a sus niveles de mal-estar laboral afectivo. Puesto que la combinación de enfoque temporal menos asociada al mal-estar en el trabajo es una en la que prima pensar en el presente y el futuro, las organizaciones deberían promover culturas poco orientadas a remover el pasado rumiando los errores y promoviendo castigos.
Downloads
References
Anderson, A., Kaplan, S. & Vega, R. (2015). The impact of telework on emotional experience: When, and for whom, does telework improve daily affective well-being? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24 (6), 882-897. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2014.966086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.966086
Burke, M. J., Brief, A. P., & George, J. M. (1993). The role of negative affectivity in understanding relations between self-reports of stressors and strains: A comment on the applied psychology literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.402
Cernas-Ortiz, D.A., Mercado-Salgado, P. & León Cázares, F. (2017). La varianza del método común en la relación entre la satisfacción laboral y la satisfacción con a la vida. Estudios Gerenciales, 33, 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2017.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2017.11.004
Cernas-Ortiz, D.A., Mercado-Salgado, P. & León Cázares, F. (2021). El boom del teletrabajo durante la pandemia por COVID-19: Conectividad social, rumia emocional y el gusto por el “home office”. En Nava-Rogel, R.M., Carbajal-Suárez, Y., García-Bencomo, M. & Flores Morales, C. (Coords.), Organizaciones y Sectores: Impacto de la Pandemia por COVID-19 (pp. 62-73). UACH
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 386-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
Cropley, M. & Purvis, L.M. (2003). Job strain and rumination about work issues during leisure time: A dairy study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12 (3), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000093
García, A. (29/12/2020). El Estrés, La Otra Pandemia. El Sol de Toluca. https://www.elsoldetoluca.com.mx/doble-via/salud/el-estres-la-otra-pandemia-6181844.html
Gere, J. & Schimmack, U. (2011). A multi-occasion multi-rater model of affective dispositions and affective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 931-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9237-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9237-3
Ghaedi, G., Tavoli, A., Bakhtiari, M., Melyani, M. & Sahragardm, M. (2010). Quality of life in college students with and without social phobia. Social Indicators Research, 97, 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9500-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9500-3
IMSS (2021). Estrés Laboral. Salud en Línea, http://www.imss.gob.mx/salud-en-linea/estres-laboral
Jamt, R., Gjerde, H., Furuhaugen, H., Romeo, J., Vindenes, V., Ramaekers, J. & Bogstrand, S. (2020). Associations between psychoactive substance use and sensation seeking behavior among drivers in Norway. BMC Public Health, 20 (23), 1 -10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8087-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8087-0
Larsen, R. & Eid, M. (2008). Diener and the science of subjective well-being. En Eid, M. & Larsen, R. (Eds.). The Science of Subjective Well-being (pp. 1-13). The Guilford Press.
Lyubomirsky, S. & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1995). Effects of self-focused rumination on negative thinking and interpersonal problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.176
McKay, M., Percy, A., Cole, J., Worrell, F. & Andretta, J. (2016). The relationship between time attitudes profiles and self-efficacy, sensation seeking, and alcohol use: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.060
Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2022). Ill-being. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ill-being
Morgan, G., Wells, K., Andretta, J. & McKay, M. (2017). Temporal attitudes profile transition among adolescents using mover-stayer latent transition analysis. Psychological Assessment, 29 (7), 890-901. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000383
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (2020) ¿Qué es tu índice para una vida mejor? Better Life Index, https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/es/about/better-life-initiative/
Raypole, C. (14/07/2021). Those Happy Golden Years: Coping with Memories that Bring More Pain than Peace. Healthline, https://www.healthline.com/health/depression/nostalgic-depression
Robbins, S. & Judge, T. (2017). Comportamiento Organizacional. Pearson.
Shahbaz, R. (13/05/2022). Cause of Stress: Getting Worried about the Future. Blogging Consultant, https://ranashahbaz.com/cause-of-stress-getting-worried-about-the-future
Shipp, A. & Aeon, B. (2019). Temporal focus: Thinking about the past, present and future. Current Opinion in Psychology, 26, 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.04.005
Shipp, A., Edwards, J. & Lambert, L. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001
Sirgy, J. (2021). The Psychology of Well-being. Springer.
Stephenson, M., Hoyle, R., Palmgreen, P. & Slater, M. (2003). Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 72, 279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.08.003
Treynor, W., González, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 247-259. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1023910315561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023910315561
Van Katwyk, P., Fox, S., Spector, P. & Kelloway, K. (2000). Using the job-related affect well-being scale (JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5 (2), 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.219
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., McIntyre, C. W., & Hamaker, S. (1992). Affect, personality, and social activity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.63.6.1011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.1011
Zimbardo, P. & Boyd, J. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (6), 1271-1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Daniel Arturo Cernas Ortiz, María del Rosario Demuner Flores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
a). Authors keep copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons attribution license. This license allows others to share the work as long as original authorship and initial publication in this journal is acknowledged.
b). Authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
c). Authors are allowed to self-archive their work in institutional repositories or on their own website before and during the submission process, as this may encourage productive exchanges and increase early and overall citation of the published work.
